
Home/Practice Areas/Family Law/Division of property
"Just and right" is not the same as equal, and "mine" is not the same as separate.
Family Law
Texas starts from a presumption that all property either spouse holds at divorce is community property. Overcoming it requires clear and convincing evidence that an asset was owned before the marriage, or received during it by gift or inheritance — and that it has stayed identifiable. That is a documentary exercise, not a matter of what everyone remembers agreeing.
Each of those is traceable with statements and, where the trail is long, with a forensic accountant. Each is also lost by default if nobody does the work.
Property owned before the marriage, and anything received during it by gift or inheritance. Compensation for personal injuries is also separate — with the significant exception of the part that represents lost earning capacity during the marriage and medical expenses paid with community funds, which stays community. It is a distinction worth getting right, because injury settlements are frequently the largest asset in the case.
Investments and stock holdings, deferred compensation and options, business ownership and partnership interests, retirement accounts and pensions, and real property. Large or complex portfolios usually need an expert valuation rather than a statement balance, and a business almost always does. The cost of a proper valuation is small next to the difference it makes to the division.
Most property cases should settle, and there are good reasons beyond avoiding a courtroom: it costs less, it finishes sooner, both spouses keep control of the outcome instead of handing it to a judge, and the result is usually easier to live with afterwards — which matters when there are children and decades of co-parenting ahead. We prepare as though it will be tried, which is precisely what makes a reasonable settlement possible.
Sudden loans to relatives, deferred bonuses, a business that stops being profitable the month a petition is filed, transfers to a new account — these patterns are recognisable. Discovery, subpoenas to financial institutions and, where warranted, a forensic accountant bring them back into the estate, and a court can take the conduct into account when dividing what is left.
Property acquired during the marriage, which Texas presumes belongs to both spouses regardless of whose name is on it.
Property owned before the marriage, and gifts and inheritances received during it. It stays separate only if it can still be identified.
No. Title is not the test. What matters is when and how it was acquired and what funds paid for it.
By tracing it through records. That is a documentary exercise, and it is the main reason statements and closing documents are worth keeping.
They are divided as property, and moving the money usually requires a separate order drafted correctly — a decree alone does not do it.
It gets valued and dealt with as an asset, usually with one spouse keeping it and the other compensated elsewhere in the division.
The patterns are recognisable, and discovery, subpoenas and a forensic accountant bring assets back into the estate. Courts can take the conduct into account.
A claim that one estate paid for something benefiting another — for example community funds paying the mortgage on separate property. It has to be quantified.
It can. Texas allows a court to consider a range of factors, including fault and the waste of community assets, in reaching a just and right division.
It can still be part of the case, though enforcement raises practical questions that are better identified early.
Free Consultation
Available 24/7 · Office hours Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM