
Home/Practice Areas/Business & Civil Litigation/Business formation/Consulting agreements
Two questions cause almost every consulting dispute: what exactly was included, and who owns what was produced.
Business Formation
A consulting relationship goes wrong when the deliverables were described in a sentence and the expectations were much larger. A usable agreement defines the work with enough specificity to say what is finished, what is out of scope, how changes are requested and priced, and what the client has to provide for the consultant to do their job at all.
The provisions that protect you are payment security, a capped liability, a clear scope with a change process, and a right to stop work when invoices go unpaid. Watch for perpetual indemnities, broad non-competes attached to a short engagement, and assignment clauses that hand your pre-existing tools and methods to a client along with the deliverable.
Get the assignment of intellectual property in writing, including any code, designs or materials. Make confidentiality survive the engagement. Require insurance where the work carries risk. And be careful about supervising a contractor like an employee — the misclassification exposure is real, and it lands on the business, not the consultant.
Scope and ownership. What exactly was included, and who owns what was produced.
Unless there is a written assignment, an independent contractor generally owns what they create — which surprises clients who assumed they were buying it.
Through a defined change process with pricing, in writing. Verbal additions are how a fixed fee quietly becomes unprofitable.
Payment terms with interest, a right to suspend work, milestone billing, and keeping ownership of deliverables until payment clears.
A written assignment of intellectual property, confidentiality that survives the engagement, insurance where the work carries risk, and clear acceptance criteria.
Texas enforces reasonable restraints tied to a legitimate interest and proper consideration. Overbroad ones get reformed or refused.
Treating a contractor like an employee. Agencies look at the control actually exercised rather than the label, and the exposure lands on the business.
For consultants, yes — proportionate to the fee rather than to the client's ambitions. It is one of the most important terms in the document.
Common and fixable. An agreement can be put in place covering work already performed, and it should be done before the first disagreement.
That is a scope and payment problem. The leverage depends on what the agreement says about suspension and ownership of unpaid work.
Free Consultation
Available 24/7 · Office hours Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM