
Home/Practice Areas/Family Law/Custody agreements/Conservatorship
Conservatorship is the set of rights and duties a parent holds. Getting it right matters on the days that are not about the schedule at all.
Family Law · Custody
Parents arrive focused on the calendar and discover later that the important questions were elsewhere: who chooses the school, who consents to surgery or psychiatric treatment, who holds the passport, who can talk to the doctors, and who has the exclusive right to designate where the child lives. Those are conservatorship rights, and they are allocated one by one in a Texas order.
The statutory presumption. Both parents hold rights and duties, some independently, some jointly and some exclusively to one parent — including, usually, the exclusive right of one parent to determine the child's primary residence within a defined geographic area.
One parent holds the major decision-making rights, with the other appointed possessory conservator. Awarded where there is a history of family violence, substance misuse, neglect, absence, or a level of conflict that makes shared decisions impossible.
Courts depart from the joint presumption where there is evidence that one parent is unfit, a history of family violence, substance misuse or neglect, significant instability in the home, or an absence long enough that shared decision-making is not realistic. It is a finding about capability and safety, not a prize for the parent who files first.
The Texas standard order gives the parent without the primary residence the first, third and fifth weekends of each month, a weeknight period during the school year, alternating holidays including Thanksgiving and the winter break, and an extended period in the summer. Spring break and the child's birthday are addressed separately, and there are different provisions for parents living more than a set distance apart. Where there is a safety concern, possession can be supervised, limited in duration, or prohibited overnight until circumstances change.
Orders can be modified on a material and substantial change: a parent's lifestyle becomes unsafe, a job is gained or lost or the hours change beyond recognition, a parent develops a substance abuse or mental health problem, or the child's own needs shift as they get older. Until the order is changed it governs exactly as written, whatever the parents have been doing between themselves.
Withholding possession, interfering with phone or video contact, and failing to return the child on time are all enforceable. The remedies run from make-up possession time and an order for the other side's attorney's fees, through contempt findings, to jail time in the extreme and repeated cases. Enforcement works best on a documented pattern rather than a single bad exchange, so keep a record and keep communication in writing.
Most orders restrict the child's primary residence to a county and contiguous counties, so that the possession schedule remains workable. Lifting or imposing that restriction is one of the more difficult modifications to win, and it turns on the reason for the move, the effect on the child's relationship with the other parent, and whether the schedule can survive the distance.
The set of rights and duties a parent holds — decisions about education, medical and psychiatric treatment, and where the child primarily lives.
No. It concerns rights and duties. The possession schedule is set separately and is frequently unequal.
Where there is a history of family violence, substance misuse, neglect or absence, or a level of conflict that makes shared decisions impossible.
Whoever holds that right under the order. It is allocated expressly, which is why reading your order matters more than assuming.
It depends on how the right to consent to psychological treatment was allocated. It is one of the most contested rights and one of the most common reasons to modify.
A limit on where the child's primary residence may be, usually a county and those next to it, so the possession schedule remains workable.
Only if the order allows it or it is modified. Relocation is one of the harder modifications to win and turns on the reason and the effect on the child's other relationship.
Ordinarily both parents keep that right, and schools and clinics sometimes need to be shown the order before they comply.
Yes, on a material and substantial change. Courts are cautious about changing which parent designates the primary residence, especially soon after an order.
The order can allocate specific rights exclusively to one parent so decisions actually get made, which is often better for the child than forced consensus.
Free Consultation
Available 24/7 · Office hours Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM